There is a wonderful - if non-tango - article in US News & World Report about the power of followers. In spite of a slowly increasing appreciation for this vital half of ourselves, I continue to see and hear a lot of defensiveness about this often misunderstood portion of the human equation. Although my entire book is dedicated to trying to explain this component of human behavior, it is filtered through Tango; this article does a very good job of explaining why following is important for everyone in the world at large. And why following is as powerful - and sometimes even more so - than leading.
Of course, I do use the Tango filter, and will do so here. But because my entire yin/yang, male/female, active/passive premise is based on the traditional Argentine tango structure (and my experience with "nuevo" "alternative" or "other" tango is quite limited), it is to the "original" which I refer in my exploration herein. ("Herein"; how erudite am I?!)
Although "leading" is often perceived as the power position, placing ourselves in that position does not a leader make. A leader is only a leader if someone follows. Even just one follower. The flip side is also true: A follower is only a follower when they allow someone to lead them. In tango, with the exepcion of very fleeting moments during each song where the roles are exchanged, a lead-er is always the lead-er, and the follow-er is always the follow-er. And never, ever, do the lead and follow happen simultaneously in both people. This is called judo.
I got to thinking about this non-ending debate again because one of the current topics in Tango Blogosphereland is the horridness of leaders. (A reality, I'm afraid, not currently confined to the world of Tango...) Most suggest that the way to improve bad leaders is to not dance with them (to not "follow" bad leaders). While this is a start, it is by no means the only choice we might entertain. There is a whole other side of the equation, remember? It takes two to Tango.
The "other side", of course, is that there are also "bad" followers. Beyond the obvious self-led steps, adornments, boleos, etc., bad following can begin from the instant a follow-er stands before their partner. It can, in fact, begin from the moment we enter a milonga.
I have noticed, more often than not, that in the US, women (the overwhelming majority of follow-ers)
- reach for their partner the instant they face each other on the dance floor. In other words, they make the first move, or lead.
- anticipate in starting or performing steps. Again, making the move before it's led.
- have a true discomfort with stillness and pausing (which is filled with frenzied adorning), which is active "lead" energy, and once again, not surrendering.
- express anger and disappointment at not being asked to dance every tanda, or at not being asked almost at all - more discomfort with waiting, aka "surrender".
Of course, it does happen that even with the proper attitude, surrender, etc., there are nights when we don't get to dance anywhere near as much as we'd like to. That's just life.
In addition, many follow-ers present themselves to their partner with certain "I'm not going to give him everything until I see whether he is worth it" reservation. The problem is that the only way to successfully dance tango is to completely surrender. This keeping - something - back - until - it's - safe attitude is anathema to creating the proper environment for tango magic. I firmly believe that the tone of the dance is set by the surrender of the follow-er in the first 5 seconds.
Once the partners have chosen to dance with each other, the lead-er will assume that he has a willing partner (why else would she accept?). But if he takes her in his embrace and senses the reservation, it can provoke a similar reservation in him, which the follow-er will then detect. The result is that neither will have surrendered completely to each other, and they will experience a less than satisfactory dance.
I know that a lot of follow-ers will argue that it is not possible to surrender to that extent with everybody. And I respectfully disagree. I believe there is a definite distinction between not "possible" and not "desirable". But I have to ask, if there is someone with whom it is not desirable to surrender, then why bother dancing with them? What's the point? If I accept a dance, I surrender completely. Even if it's for the one dance. When I surrender to my partner, I can physically experience his own surrender to me. And then the dance goes to a different level.
Let me share what has always worked for me.
- My surrender begins the moment I enter the door. I am here as a complete person, no matter what happens tonight. I have no way of knowing whether I will dance a lot, a little, or not at all. I choose not to measure my self-esteem in this manner. Dancing is not the only reason I come here. I love the music. I love my friends. I love to watch because even after all these years, there is something to learn. I am happy to be here, no matter what.
- When I am invited to dance, I wait until my partner has begun to embrace me before I respond. Determining the type of embrace is part of the "lead".
Follow-ers, as the article clearly and brilliantly explains, do have power and control. When faced with a bad lead-er, we can simply refuse to follow (i.e. "dance").
